Did Englewood Mislead NJ Court About Its Housing Plan?

During Dr. Rosenzweig’s tenure as Council President, the City entered into a housing settlement before the Superior Court of New Jersey to address its fair share housing obligation. The City presented sworn testimony asserting that its housing plan would create a realistic opportunity to construct thousands of apartment units, in single-family neighborhoods, flood zones, and across Englewood. However, only 20%  of these units would be designated for affordable housing. Yet, just two years later, Dr. Rosenzweig publicly stated during a council meeting that the development of these apartments would "never happen," declaring bluntly, “It is impossible.” This statement directly contradicts the testimony presented by the City in Court.

So, what’s really going on here?

The Court approved the City’s housing plan, calling it fair because it provided “a realistic opportunity for the construction of affordable housing.” The Court emphasized that its approval relied on whether the proposed settlement would expedite the construction of a significant number of low-income housing units.

Dr. Rosenzweig’s recent public comment raises troubling questions. Did the City mislead the Court with its sworn testimony? Why would elected officials claim under oath that Englewood’s housing plan would enable the construction of affordable housing, only to later admit that such development is not feasible?

This contradiction strikes the heart of public trust. Was the Court misled, or are we, the residents of Englewood, being deceived?

The truth matters. It’s time for our elected officials to be held accountable and to uphold the public trust by speaking honestly.

Join us in demanding transparency and integrity from our leaders. Together, we can ensure accountability and protect our community’s future.